Rumor is Don Gaetz will allow Alan Bense to remain Chairman of Triumph for a year. Then Gaetz will formally take over. In the interim, Gaetz will make all major decisions as he controls a majority of the board.
Is Don Gaetz planning to take over the Triumph board at tomorrow’s (July 13) meeting at IHMC?
Does anyone know if the same military generals who spent 28 million dollars on Afghan woodland camouflage pattern uniforms, where 98% of the country is desert, are the ones asking for thousands more young soldiers to die in their 14 year war?
Last Sunday Don Gaetz wrote an excellent editorial on the need for ethical reform for those in public service and those who benefit from having been in public service. The very next day 300 million from BP was deposited in the Triumph Corporation bank account. On that same day something else happened. Mr. Gaetz’s fellow senator, Joe Negron as president of the Senate appointed someone Speaker Richard Corcoran wanted to the Triumph board. And, Corcoran appointed someone Negron wanted to the Triumph Board. In a shallow almost silly effort to conceal who really made these appointments, Corcoran appointed Don Gaetz.
So, Don Gaetz sponsored and secured passage of a law that diverts 1.5 billion owed to the eight NW Florida counties to Triumph, a private Corporation he created when he was President of the Senate. Mr. Gaetz later effectively selected a majority of the five initial board members. This last session of the legislature the board was expanded to add one board member ostensibly to represent the interests of the smaller counties to the east and one more board member from Walton County alone, making seven board members. Mr. Gaetz was Mr. Negron’s Walton County selection. Escambia County doesn’t have a representative. Mr. Gaetz is now formally and effectively in charge of 1.5 billion that will be expended by Triumph.
Outzen has made a living out of effectively selling spots in his top 100 influence list. The last list was embarrassing to say the least. Selling praise is not all that bad because it is self-evident silly. His man-crush on the Mayor is well, beyond embarrassing. You could say he is unfair, but he has a right to be unfair because he controls what is printed. He is steadfast in his desire to paint everything that is being accomplished to promote the City of Pensacola in the most negative fashion possible.
Calling what he prints “news” is like calling cod “a snapper filet.” It may look like snapper, but it ain’t quite the same. But pretend snapper isn’t killing the community image – his substitute for news is.
An open letter to the citizens of Pensacola from the Office of the Mayor…
I know we are all pleased having Navy Federal here. But, the elephant in the room is their failure to pay any federal income tax. As this article points out although the basis of federal tax exemptions for small very limited in scope credit unions is part of our national fabric, massive 60 billion dollar banking businesses are not. For any business person facing the possibility that a competitor 60 times bigger can pay better wages and support extraordinary compensation for their executives because they are not required to pay federal income taxes is an unfair competitive advantage. And that is exactly this credit union disparity as compared to our local banks. Congress should end this federal income tax exemption for any credit union over a billion dollars in assets. This is an unsupportable abuse of the historic tax exemption afforded to small local credit unions.
PNJ, it’s ok to say you dropped the ball.
The PNJ missed any coverage of the Triumph confiscation of the BP oil spill money plan for nearly two years. The editor just published an editorial extolling the benefits of diverting money away from Escambia County. The cartoon accompanying the editorial portrayed our county commissioners as buffoons. She wrote that the money would be better given to a private corporation ( that is accountable to no one ) than to our county commissioners.
The PNJ publisher needs to have a meeting with the editor and explain to her that baselessly bashing our elected officials is not advancing the efforts of so many others to bring new industry here. It is a continuing problem as Gannett’s musical chairs staffing of the PNJ never finds anyone here very long. The irony of her editorial blaming state senator George Gainer for protecting the small counties in his district’s claim for some of the BP money is Mr. Gainer’s district was formerly represented by Don Gaetz. Mr. Gainer is protecting his constituents which Mr. Gaetz seemed to forget when he was their senator as he set up the Triumph Corporation and provided not a penny to these smaller counties impacted by the oil spill. So, all the small counties to the east of Okaloosa were neglected and counties to the west of Okaloosa, including Escambia were cut out of any of the BP oil spill recovery. Destin residents comprise a majority of the five board members of Triumph that will decide where they will spend $1.5 billion. Destin, Mr. Gaetz home.
The PNJ editor advocates not giving 18 million to each county (eight) because the smaller counties are well, smaller counties. Problem is that cuts out Escambia and Santa Rosa as well. She says she favors “regional” projects. It is obvious she has absolutely no idea what they are or how they could impact our two counties. Her editorial is a last minute effort to justify the PNJ ignoring for two full years this grab of the BP money. So what, it didn’t matter is the implication of the editorial. Yes it matters. It matters to the smallest counties and it matters to us. Senator Gainer sees this for what it is, a grab for cash for unaccountable spending. He is trying to insert accountability. Any responsible newspaper should applaud the effort.
Shallow as the editorial is, the greater harm of the editorial is the insulting manner with which she disparages all county and city elected officials and by implication we the ignorant voters that have elected them. Real great stuff for recruiting businesses to locate here.
Polls Reveal Majority of Americans Against Limiting Non-Economic Damages in Medical Malpractice & Nursing Home Lawsuits
Public Policy Polling (PPP) recently released data from phone polls conducted in late March on the topic of H.R. 1215, a House bill that will be voted on in the next several weeks. H.R. 1215 seeks to limit non-economic damages to $250,000 in medical malpractice, nursing home abuse, prescription and OTC drug and medical device lawsuits. PPP asked the same set of questions to between 500-700 registered voters in 7 red (Republican) and purple states (those that have voted both Republican & Democratic in the past several elections). Polling only red & purple states was intentional, as Republicans have traditionally leaned towards tort reform, the act of limiting medical malpractice and nursing home abuse lawsuits in favor of protecting big corporations. PPP found that in the polled states of Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, Alabama and Arizona, support for H.R. 1215 was virtually non-existent, with over 60% of polled citizens in every state disagreeing with the bill.
Even more impressive was the percentage of voters in each state that believed nursing homes should be held accountable if acts of negligence caused the injury or death of a loved one. The amount of support for nursing home abuse and negligence lawsuits was 77% at its lowest (Florida), and 86% at its highest (Georgia).
Finally, each state’s opposition to H.R. 1215 grew stronger as the person conducting the phone interview gave more information on the bill to voters.
Poll Results by State
The poll results for each state are as follows:
- 63% against H.R. 1215
- 77% believed nursing homes should be held accountable for negligence/abuse of loved one
- 68% against H.R. 1215
- 86% believed nursing homes should be held accountable for negligence/abuse of loved one
- 68% against H.R. 1215
- 81% believed nursing homes should be held accountable for negligence/abuse of loved one
- 70% against H.R. 1215
- 85% believed nursing homes should be held accountable for negligence/abuse of loved one
- 64% against H.R. 1215
- 82% believed nursing homes should be held accountable for negligence/abuse of loved one
- 63% oppose H.R. 1215
- 81% believed nursing homes should be held accountable for negligence/abuse of loved one
- 67% oppose H.R. 1215
- 81% believed nursing homes should be held accountable for negligence/abuse of loved one
Lawmakers’ Re-Election Bids May Depend on H.R. 1215
If lawmakers haven’t paid attention to the constant stream of H.R. 1215 opposition voicemails and emails coming from their constituents, they may want to start. PPP’s survey found that regardless of political party affiliation, 58% of voters would be less likely to vote for the re-election of their representative if he or she supported the bill.
The bottom line here is that voters have simply reached a point where it has become inexcusable to continue to allow big businesses to get away with oversight, negligence, and greed at the expense of the American people. Whether Democrat or Republican, PPP’s data shows that voters refuse to buy into the idea that non-economic damages don’t encourage corporations, hospitals, and other healthcare-related businesses to be BETTER. In this era of profits above all else, awarding non-economic damages in line with the injustice incurred sends a message that we deserve more as patients, nursing home residents, and people.
(originally posted by Levin & Perconti, Chicago, Illinois, Illinois Medical Malpractice Blog, April 10, 2017)
Four days after the Bondi settlement announcement of the 1.5 billion dollar BP settlement, the Gaetz/Destin group of three directors met with the other two directors in Sandestin. Fully two years prior in 2013, Triumph Gulf Coast, Inc. was created by then Senator Don Gaetz in anticipation that substantial sums would be received by the State of Florida and he wanted to control those funds. Very few people during this two year period understood how this was all going to circumvent local control over the settlement funds. These minutes are interesting. UWF staff appear to be involved yet there is no defined role for UWF by statute or otherwise. It all is made to appear very official with grand theatre demonstrated by comments from Senator Gaetz and others. It all sounds like such a great idea. In the end however the five directors of Triumph Gulf Coast are accountable to no one. They are free to award the money with virtually unlimited discretion. Five unelected people parceling out 1.5 billion plus earned interest. No one, no one has any idea how this is going to operate including the board of directors.
The following is the statute that created the Triumph Gulf Coast Corporation in 2013, two years before the Bondi announced settlement.
A Who’s Who…*
Juan Ramos (photo) – A Cuban refugee who arrived in Florida during the Mariel boatlift, Ramos was living in Cocoa when he was arrested and convicted of murder. He was sent to death row when he was 25 years old. He was acquitted after a second trial.
Wilton Dedge – Was a 20-year-old high school dropout from Port St. John in 1981. He lived with his parents in Port St. John and worked on car transmissions at a shop in New Smyrna Beach. He spent 22 years in prison for a rape he did not commit.
William Dillon – Was an out-of-work 22-year-old living with his parents in Satellite Beach in 1981 when he was arrested, tried and convicted of a murder he did not commit. He spent nearly 28 years in prison before being exonerated.
Gary Bennett – Was an out-of-work 26-year-old who has spent the last 33 years in prison for the murder of his neighbor Helen Nardi in 1983.
Gerald Stano – Regarded by many to be both a serial killer and a serial confessor, Stano was executed for the Brevard County murder of Kathy Lee Scharf. He was already serving several life sentences in Florida when he was convicted in Brevard.
Dean Moxley – Now a retired judge, Moxley was the chief prosecutor for the State Attorney’s Office in Brevard County. He personally prosecuted Dedge, Ramos, Bennett and Stano and was the supervising attorney for the Dillon trial.
Clarence Zacke – The owner of a West Melbourne junkyard, Zacke dabbled in the stolen car business before starting to smuggle marijuana from the islands on his own plane. Arrested on drug charges, Zacke then worked to eliminate the witnesses against him. He ordered the murder Richard Lee Hunt, the brother of prosecutor Michael Hunt. He also tried to have State Attorney Doug Cheshire and Judge William Woodson executed. He raped his adopted daughter for years. He became a star witness for the state in several high profile cases.
John Preston – A former Pennsylvania State Trooper, Preston used tracking dogs to become an expert witness testifying around the country in criminal cases. He was discredited and proven to be a fraud. His testimony helped send Wilton Dedge, Juan Ramos and William Dillon to prison.
*Written by John A. Torres, Florida Today, March 19, 2017 — original article at this link)
In 2012, some politically powerful people in North Florida secured the services of then Senator Don Gaetz to help them control 1.5 billion of funds that BP was expected to pay for the carnage to the Gulf Coast caused by the BP oil spill. The concern of these behind the scenes power brokers was that they did not want our elected officials to have any control over these funds. So Senator Gaetz introduced legislation to set up a corporation that would have all money funneled through it. When he set it up he named five political friends to the board of directors. Three are from his home base of Destin, Florida. One lives in Santa Rosa County and one resides in Bay County. None are from Pensacola or even Escambia County. These five will control 1.5 billion dollars. They will not be accountable to the taxpayers or the voters. Did anyone ever see an application for a position on this board of directors? The answer of course is no. This was done long before most of us had any idea about the feverish effort that was undertaken to get control of the settlement money that would come later.
The Speaker of the Florida House of Representative, Mr. Richard Corcoran, has expressed concern about accountability of the disbursement of this very substantial amount of money. He is right. This money should be awarded to the counties impacted and the municipalities within those counties on a block grant population basis. Doing it on the basis of population with direct payments made to the counties and cities would assure that the money will be spent not based on what a committee of people outside our community want but based on what our elected officials decide is best. But more importantly elected officials are accountable to the voters. The fact that this transformative award of money has been sidetracked through the Gaetz created Triumph Corporation is hardly a triumph for the taxpayers. We will never know the names of the people who got Don Gaetz to do it, but we have a hunch. We do know this was all in process well before the Pam Bondi 1.5 billion dollar settlement was even reached.
Had this board been established to be fairly inclusive and without potential conflicts of interest it would have looked entirely different than it does now. If Mr. Gaetz wanted to assure transparency he could have selected Andy Marlette of the PNJ for the board. If he wanted people who have a history of doing great things for the community he could have added the president of the league of women voters or the president of Impact 100 to his board. If he truly wanted inclusion, he could have selected members from the minority community. There are countless other fine people who would have volunteered to help oversee the proper and fair use of this money.
Mayor Hayward of Pensacola has called for block grants to the cities and counties and he is right to do so. Having a fishing village like Destin controlling a majority of this board is a short tail wagging a big dog. Pensacola is the largest City and Escambia is the largest county of the eight counties and the cities within them. Our communities should receive our fair share of this 1.5 Billion dollars settlement and we need our elected officials to control the money. Our legislative delegation should be demanding this dismantling of this Triumph Corporation before they get their hands on the money. This is once in decade’s infusion of money that may never happen again and it is so important to the future of our communities.
Ciclovia: Pensacola Open Streets Event
The City of Pensacola is proud to support the inaugural Ciclovia Open Streets Pensacola event, on Saturday March 25th from 9AM to 2PM.
Open Streets Pensacola is a free, safe, and inclusive event that will focus on fitness, recreation, and community programs along five miles of road for people to experience the streets in a new way.
We invite you to bike, walk, run, skate, roll, or dance your way through the scenic and historic route of Downtown Pensacola from Community Maritime Park on Main Street to Gulf Power on Bayfront Parkway and along Palafox from Garden Street to Plaza de Luna! There will be many activities along the route including fitness classes, sports demonstrations, music, dancing, helmet fittings, a bike skills clinic, plus games and fun activities for all ages.
Bring your friends to Ciclovia Open Streets Pensacola for a walkable, vehicle-free, and thrilling adventure!
WEEK 2: Street Resurfacing and Natural Gas Infrastructure Upgrades
More than 32,500 square yards of pavement has been milled, and nearly 11,000 tons of new asphalt placed in the first two weeks of the citywide street resurfacing program.
Thus far, work has focused in west Pensacola, but beginning Monday, March 6, crews also started working in downtown areas to repair concrete features such as sidewalks, curbs, and handicap accessibility ramps.
Milling and resurfacing of downtown city streets is scheduled to begin in mid-April and continue into the summer months. The multiyear construction program encompasses 1,800 blocks of city streets. The streets have not been resurfaced for a decade or more.
Read more here.
Letter of Appreciation: Fire Department Engine Crew 6
On February 28, Captain Vines (and the crew of Engine 6) responded to an Assistance Lifting call. An 81 year old male slid out of bed and his elderly wife was unable to help with his return. Engine 6 assisted their resident back into his bed and Captain Vines had a wellness conversation with his wife regarding her husband’s long-term health status and special needs. Insurance and financial issues had created a delay in the family receiving a wheelchair.
Fearing the potential for injury, due to deteriorating mobility, Reese offered to provide a wheelchair. The next morning, Captain Vines and members of Station 6 delivered a wheelchair to our grateful Wimbledon Drive family.
As you know, this past year has been a challenging one in the Vines family. His recognition of this special need, and swift intervention, is truly an act of exceptional customer service.
– Ginny Cranor, Battalion Chief – C Watch, Pensacola Fire Department
Relay for Life Masquerade Ball and Silent Auction
Relay For Life of Pensacola is hosting its very first Masquerade Ball and Silent Auction on March 10th from 7PM to 12AM at the Artel Gallery (223 Palafox Place).
Relay For Life seeks to give everyone, in communities across the globe, the chance to celebrate the lives of people who have battled cancer, remember loved ones lost, and fight back against the disease. The theme “Masquerade” was chosen for this Ball in order to symbolize how little is known about the disease that is cancer, but how the organization is searching to find out more.
McGuire’s 40th Annual 5K Run
McGuire’s Irish Pub is hosting its 40th St. Patrick’s Day Prediction 5K Run on Saturday, March 11th at 9AM.
The race goes on, rain or shine, and will start and finish at McGuire’s Irish Pub (600 E Gregory St). Each runner or walker predicts how long it will take them to complete the 3.1 mile course. Participants who come the closest to the time predicted on their registration form win.
Crossing the finish line is just the beginning. Stay for the after party, where there will be refreshments and entertainment until 12PM. To register for the race, or for more information, visit the event website.
Maritime de Luna Du Youth Duathon
The Maritime de Luna Du Youth Duathlon is the first of two events in the TriGulfCoast Youth Multisport Series.
The De Luna Du Duathlon will be held March 12, 2017 at Pensacola’s Community Maritime Park at 8:30AM. The race will offer a scenic run-bike-run course for kids ages 6 to 15.
Smokin’ in the Square 8th Annual Charity BBQ Cookoff
The Knights of Columbus will host their 8th annual Smokin’ in the Square event March 17th and 18th in Seville Square.
This barbecue cook off raises funds through activities and food sales, and the proceeds are donated to local charities. What was once a small, backyard-competitor cook off is now a large event with an average of 50 pro teams and 25 backyard teams showing up each year. There will be live entertainment, cooking competitions, and other activities.
Smokin’ in the Square is free to attend, but VIP tickets are also available for those who would like special access to the Lee House, next door to the square, where they can enjoy their barbecue. For tickets and more information, visit the event website.
Jacksonian Guard Colors Ceremony
The Jacksonian Guard is a Pensacola re-enactment group of soliders from the Jacksonian and Spanish era. The next event will be March 18th at 12 noon in Plaza Ferdinand on Palafox Street.
The ceremony commemorates Pensacola’s 195th Birthday and Florida as a U.S. Territory. It will continue to take place every third Saturday of each month through 2017. Join the guard at the flagpole in the center of Plaza Ferdinand, and see a demonstration of Pensacola’s rich heritage.
The Jacksonian Guard currently consists of mainly students ages 12 to 29. They are young to represent the youthful composition of Andrew Jackson’s army and the great talent that exists among our youth today in Pensacola. Membership is open to any area youth willing to perform in these re-enactments. Inquiries can be sent to email@example.com, or for more information, call (850) 466-5220.
Project GreenShores Cleanup
Join Ocean Hour Florida for a Project Greenshores and Bartram Park Cleanup on Saturday, March 18.
Project Greenshores is at the Three Mile Bridge on Bayfront Parkway (745 Bayfront Parkway). The second location is Bartram Park (211 Bayfront Parkway, behind The Fish House). Buckets, grabbers, gloves, and trash bags will be supplied. Sign in at 8:45AM and the clean up will be from 9AM to 10AM.
For more information, contact firstname.lastname@example.org or call (850) 450-1112.
Pensacola Citizens Academy 2017
This week, we kicked off the 2017 Pensacola Citizens Academy: a free, nine week program for residents to learn more about their local government, community, and how to take that knowledge to better their neighborhoods and be more active participants in their city.
At the first meeting, academy registrants visited City Hall for presentations from the City Administrator, Constituent Services, Finance, and the City Clerk. Thank you to our attendees. We look forward to the next eight weeks!
For a sneak peek of this week’s meeting, click the image below.
Instagram: Photo of the Week
While all the Trump people are bashing fake news, it might be well to note the benefits. Let me cite a few local examples…
If someone wrote a story saying Outzen apologized for his non-stop trashing of the City of Pensacola we would see three reactions: The vast majority could care less, but of the minority, some would see real hope that he had repented and would return to some form of journalistic honor. The remaining few would know that the news was fake and double down their vocal objection of him killing the community to get trade out ads. Contrast that with a true story that Outzen was continuing his bashing of the City of Pensacola and its Mayor and absolutely no one would even read it.
A story is published that the Fish House manager apologized for ruining the ambiance of the historic district and agreed to tear down their garish flashing EAT NOW sign. No one would believe it. The benefit of such a fake news story however would be to highlight the level of offensive conduct the ARB permits for their friends.
Speaking of the ARB and their alternative facts , they recently rejected a night lighting of the new YMCA sign. An unequivocal insult to the generosity of the Bear, Levin and Studer families who gave millions to build the “Y.” Fake News would consist of a story about how each of the ARB members care greatly for the historic district and that the granting of permission for the lighted all night billboard sign was to help illuminate the streets of the historic district ( the need to do it would be an example of an alternative fact ) . The bogus story would go on to explain that since Zaragoza Street has street lights there is no need to have a Fish House type illuminated YMCA sign.
In Pensacola the ARB has just proposed a conflict of interest disclosure requirement that can be waived depending who is asking for what favor at the time. This is of course fake news because they would never pass a conflict of interest code.
Feb 03, 2017 — When Ringling Bros. and Barnum and Bailey Circus folded its tent last month, 400 Floridians lost their jobs. Now, Florida’s Governor Rick Scott appears determined to turn his state’s drive for jobs into a Cuba policy clown show.
Gov. Scott, on the eve of a “jobs summit” that he is staging, unleashed a twitter storm and released a state budget to pressure port officials and cut off funds for port projects to stop Florida ports and businesses from trading with Cuba.
At a time when the Governors of nine states, between 2015 and 2017, have brought trade delegations to Cuba for the express purpose of doing deals and creating two-way trade with Cuba, Gov. Scott, uniquely, seems determined to kill jobs – or prevent jobs from being created – in his own state. Simply because those jobs would depend on Florida having commercial relations with Cuba.
Whether he is acting out of “principle” or acting out of self-interest, Gov. Scott is “acting out” and most abnormally for a government official.
Except. Wait a minute. Tweeting? Pushing people around? Breaking trade deals? This seems awfully familiar.
When it comes to Cuba, Florida – to put it kindly – has always been a paradox unable to come to terms with itself. No state in the union has worked harder to impose sanctions on Cuba, and no state has benefited more from trade and travel with the island.
Since 1959, it has been the center of resistance to the existence of the Cuban system. Now, majorities in the diaspora community and across Florida support an open policy. Florida’s airports, slowly then dramatically, have filled with hundreds of thousands of Cubans and Cuban Americans flying back and forth between the U.S. and Cuba. After the passage of a revised trade sanctions law in 2000, the state’s ports saw off the ships sailing to Havana, and then to Mariel, with containers of food and the other limited but legally traded items U.S. businesses could sell to the island.
Until January, as the U.S.-Cuba Trade and Economic Council points out, it was the state’s policy under Governor Scott to make normal trade with Cuba a priority for Florida’s seaports. “Due to the proximity of the state to Cuba and the cultural ties, expanded trade opportunities could be dramatic.” Some business leaders believed Sunshine State trade with Cuba could one day create 20,000 local jobs.
Yes, trade with Cuba does build profits for U.S. businesses and create U.S. jobs. Not just for Florida. Since these opportunities are also open to ports up and down the Atlantic coast, and along the southeast states on the Gulf, Florida has competition; to preserve and expand employment, it has to keep up its investments in trade with Cuba.
Enter the ringmaster. While others wait for the Trump Administration to review Cuba policy (Reuters says that’s happening now), Rick Scott leapt into the ring.
As officials at Port Everglades and the Port of Palm Beach prepared to welcome Cuban counterparts from Cuba’s National Port Administration and sign Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) to build cooperation between their ports and Cuba, Gov. Scott made it clear he didn’t want Florida ports to make deals with Cuba.
Scott tweeted in English and Spanish, as the Miami Herald reported, “We cannot condone Raul Castro’s oppressive behavior,” and added that he’d ask “state legislators to cut off funding for any Florida ports that ‘enter into any agreement with [the] Cuban dictatorship.’” This caused the knees of Port Everglades and Palm Beach to buckle; there, officials agreed to meet the Cuban delegation but not to sign the MOUs. And, as we report below, it had the same effect on the Port of Tampa, with a spokesperson even denying it ever planned to sign an MOU with Cuba to a reporter who filed a story with a copy of the agreement in his hands.
Yes, the Scott saga even comes with an alternative set of facts. As Paul Guzzo wrote, “The truth is, according to an internal document obtained by the Tampa Bay Times, Port Tampa Bay had already drawn up a memorandum, gotten approval from the federal office, circulated the word in maritime circles and garnered congratulations for its efforts.”
Deciding, apparently, to enlarge rather than quell the problem, Scott put language in his budget, as the Miami Herald reported, that says no money can be “allocated to infrastructure projects that result in the expansion of trade with the Cuban dictatorship because of their continued human rights abuses.”
The Bradenton Herald slammed the governor for his “inconsistency” for supporting trade with China, and added that “Scott’s threat puts Florida at a competitive disadvantage to ports along the Gulf Coast, East Coast, Caribbean islands and Central America [which are] signing agreements with Cuba.”
We asked Dr. Michael Bustamante, a scholar at Florida International University, to interpret the Governor’s behavior. “It’s clear Governor Scott is returning to an old playbook, one in which U.S.-Cuba policy – or in this case Florida-Cuba policy – is a function of domestic politics, not national or state interests.”
The day Gov. Scott released his budget and doubled down on his investment in stopping bilateral trade with Cuba, the Miami Herald observed, “the first legal maritime shipment from Cuba to the U.S. in more than 50 years” had made its way to Miami-Dade County, after reaching Port Everglades the week before. It was two containers of “artisanal” Cuban charcoal. And more may be coming to a pizza oven near you, even if Governor Scott succeeds in sanctioning businesses in his own state, in the name of shutting down trade with Cuba.
What a circus.
Source: From the director of the Center for Democracy in the Americas — The Center for Democracy in the Americas promotes a U.S. policy toward Cuba based on engagement and recognition of Cuba’s sovereignty. democracyinamericas.org
In a recent exposé, journalists from Reveal at The Center for Investigative Reporting exposed an accountability gap that has allowed the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to pour over $130 million of development assistance into projects run by Planet Aid. USDA continues to invest in Planet Aid even after being presented with evidence that their projects are tied to a corrupt and abusive cult. While many aspects of this report yield troubling lessons for U.S. taxpayers who are footing the bill, the one that struck a chord here at Accountability Counsel was the final conclusion – there is no policy framework at USDA preventing harm and abuse, and no accountability system committed to uncovering, investigating, and remedying harm to victims of USDA-funded projects.
The Reveal investigation demonstrates harm from lack of oversight and accountability with just one aid recipient, at one institution. As lawyers for communities around the world harmed by internationally-financed development projects, we know that this Planet Aid scheme is the proverbial tip of the iceberg. This conclusion applies not just to USDA, but to the more than 20 U.S. federal agencies that invest in development abroad, representing at least $65 billion a year in aid and financing. Until U.S. agencies adopt both a strong policy framework and a robust accountability system that can deliver remedy, we have no way to ensure that U.S. investment is reaching its intended beneficiaries and is doing more good than harm.
To date, only one U.S. federal agency – the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) – has gotten even part way there. While OPIC has created policies designed to avoid harm and abuse tied to an accountability framework, it still lacks the critical remedy piece. Our case supporting Liberian communities to use OPIC’s Office of Accountability shows why this missing remedy piece of the framework matters.
In Liberia, OPIC’s failed investment into Buchanan Renewables’ biomass project drove farmers into poverty, contaminated water, and involved sexual abuse of local women, among other catastrophes. As a result of a community-led complaint, an OPIC Office of Accountability investigation affirmed many of the community’s allegations. Whereas USDA has made no acknowledgement of wrongdoing in the Planet Aid situation and has failed to investigate, the OPIC findings were an important public acknowledgement that OPIC failed. The OPIC investigation also uncovered a more systemic failure to ensure that human rights and environmental risks of OPIC’s investments were dealt with appropriately. As a result, OPIC has recently increased its due diligence staff and is undergoing a full, public review of its human rights and environmental policies. These positive fixes are critical to OPIC avoiding a repeat of the harm that resulted from the Buchanan Renewables investment. They show progress toward a good policy and accountability framework from which USDA could learn.
However, even after all of the positive systemic impact from their complaint, the communities in Liberia are still suffering. They are worse off than they were before OPIC made its investment. To be truly accountable for its failure, OPIC must deliver remedy for people harmed by its investments. If OPIC gets this right, all federal agencies – including USDA – can benefit from the model it creates.
What would U.S. agencies getting it right look like? Accountability structures must ensure that confirmed allegations of abuse tied to projects or investments result in the power to correct mistakes, so that people’s rights and dignity and the environment are respected where aid and investment hit the ground. OPIC has the chance to lead by example through creation of, for example, a remedy fund tied to its accountability framework. This fund could be paid into through insurance or bonds and could then deliver compensation to victims and make good on the promise the United States has made to its taxpayers – that OPIC’s investments help “solve critical development challenges.”
For OPIC, USDA, and all of the U.S. agencies involved in development aid and finance, we can’t make progress on closing these accountability gaps soon enough. Our own clients in Liberia, victims of Planet Aid schemes, and millions of others harmed by U.S. development spending each year, are still waiting for remedy from a system not designed to deliver it. Our country’s tremendous resources can do tremendous good – or harm – and it’s up to all of us to get it right.
CREDIT: This article first appeared in The Huffington Post, The Blog, April 20, 2016, under the title of “Dysfunction in Development Aid Runs Deep” authored by Kindra Mohr, Policy Director at Accountability Counsel and Co-authored by Natalie Bridgeman Fields, Founder and Executive Director of Accountability Counsel
Inmates are scheduled to arrive in January. The new prison on Cervantes street is a horizontal expansion from the food sales division of Publix. Economies of scale will result from bag boys serving time while carrying out groceries. One early criticism of the stark no window building was recently addressed by adding faux windows. Most of the people driving by will believe the prison has real windows. Publix will voluntarily post “Do Not Pick Up Hitchhikers” signs up and down the street. There is real neighborhood excitement over the extra lighting being installed in the parking lot adjacent to residences. The Publix commitment to building architecturally compatible neighborhood building structures is a core value of the company.
Keep partisan revenge out of state constitution —An Editorial
Sun Sentinel Editorial Board
Floridians need to stay informed on judiciary amendment
Florida voters had to be aware of a sneaky constitutional amendment this year. They may have to be even more informed and focused in 2018.
The 2016 subterfuge was an amendment related to solar energy that advertised itself as consumer-friendly. In fact, Florida’s investor-owned utilities financed the amendment with $26 million in hopes of securing a monopoly on solar power. Voters, however, wised up. The amendment fell far short of the 60 percent needed for approval.
For 2018, the looming danger is amendments that seek to undermine Florida’s independent judiciary. This issue may not sound as sexy as energy from the sun, but it’s far more important.
Florida is the only state in which an appointed body — the Constitution Revision Commission — can put amendments on the ballot without court review. The 37-member commission meets every 20 years, and the next iteration starts in 2017 to decide which amendments — if any — go on the 2018 ballot.
The governor gets 15 appointments, including the chairman. The House speaker and Senate president get nine, the chief justice of the Florida Supreme Court gets three and the attorney general is automatically a member. When Florida created the commission in 1965, the intent was to provide regular review of the new state constitution — approved in 1968 — to propose bipartisan updates. For House Speaker Richard Corcoran, R-Land O’ Lakes, however, his priority is partisan revenge.
Two weeks ago, Corcoran addressed the business group Associated Industries of Florida. Corcoran told AIF that his appointees to the Constitution Revision Commission must favor term limits for Florida Supreme Court justices, who now can serve until age 70, like all of Florida’s jurists. In addition, Corcoran said his “litmus test” is that commission members be “conservative.”
Though he claims that conservatives “get the separation of powers,” Corcoran is not acting like such a conservative. He wants to make the Florida Supreme Court subservient to the Legislature because he opposes the court’s rulings on, to name a few, school vouchers, workers compensation insurance and, especially, redistricting.
In 2010, voters approved constitutional amendments that prohibited the Legislature from drawing gerrymandered congressional and legislative districts to favor parties and incumbents. Last year, the groups that sponsored the amendments successfully challenged the congressional and state Senate maps the Republican-controlled Legislature drew in 2012.
Both amendments got nearly 63 percent of the vote. Evidence showed that, despite promises of transparency, Republican leaders had worked in secret with party operatives to draw maps that favored the GOP. The legal challenge ensured that the amendments would work as voters intended.
Corcoran now wants the Constitutional Revision Commission to go after “bad decisions” — translation: his side lost — by the Florida Supreme Court. He wants proposals to neuter the Fair Districts Amendments and impose 12-year-term limits on Supreme Court justices.
Republicans earlier targeted the justices after the court in 2010 struck some misleading amendments from the ballot. In 2011, the House proposed an amendment that would have split the seven-member Supreme Court into a pair of five-member divisions — criminal and civilian.
Conveniently, the Democratic-appointed justices would have gone into the criminal division. Judges whom the GOP liked would have gone into the civil division, which would have reviewed constitutional amendments. Gov. Rick Scott would have appointed three new justices. It was court-packing. Fortunately, the Senate blocked it.
Even a weakened version of the amendment got less than 40 percent the next year. Also in 2012, Corcoran tried to finance a campaign to defeat three justices who were up for merit retention. He called them “the enemy of the free markets.” All kept their jobs. One is Jorge Labarga, the current chief justice who will make those three appointments to the Constitution Revision Commission.
Corcoran alone would be dangerous enough, but Senate President Joe Negron, R-Stuart, also wants the commission to review the Fair Districts Amendments. Scott’s statements show that he prefers the judiciary to be a wholly-owned subsidiary of the executive and judicial branches — if Republicans control them.
In 1998, the Constitution Revision Commission property focused its work on changes intended to make state government work better. The most important amendment shrunk the Florida Cabinet by making the education and insurance commissioners appointed, not elected. In 1978, voters rejected all eight of the commission’s amendments, but most — such as the right to privacy — became law later.
It takes 22 votes to get an amendment on the ballot. We don’t know what the commission will produce. Based on the early comments, however, we know that there’s reason for Floridians to start worrying and stay informed.
Florida’s broken sentencing system — designed for fairness, it fails to account for prejudice (Sarasota Herald-Tribune)
Justice has never been blind when it comes to race in Florida.
Blacks were first at the mercy of slave masters. Then came Jim Crow segregation and the Ku Klux Klan.
Now, prejudice wears a black robe.
Half a century after the civil rights movement, trial judges throughout Florida sentence blacks to harsher punishment than whites, a Herald-Tribune investigation found.
They offer blacks fewer chances to avoid jail or scrub away felonies.
They give blacks more time behind bars — sometimes double the sentences of whites accused of the same crimes under identical circumstances…
There is no allegation of corruption of the vote in our election. The complaint is the Russians favored Trump over Clinton and did some media manipulation to advance their preferred candidate. This seems pretty mild compared to what we have done for a very long time in countries all over the world…
From the Washington Post, “The long history of the United States interfering with elections elsewhere”
We have been assured by the Pensacola Young Professionals that all supporting data for the Studer Community Survey that they published will be made available to the public. Mr. Studer pays for the survey, pays to present it for publication the way he wants it presented and does all of it in the name of the Pensacola Young Professionals. PYP claims that somehow Mason-Dixon polling was involved. We hired a polling expert who wrote to Mason-Dixon and asked for the raw data. They have refused to provide it notwithstanding the assurances of the PYP that they would provide it. We have asked the PYP to request Mr. Studer direct Mason Dixon to release the raw data. The “PYP survey” that was published by Mr. Studer presented a bleak picture of the City of Pensacola. The results were touted by the dark side bloggers as proof positive the City was going in the wrong direction. The minute it was published the response from many in the community was confusion. How could everything seem like it is terrific in the City with businesses flourishing but only 45% of the people polled thought the city was headed in the right direction, a 25% decrease in public approval from the previous year. It was an astonishing drop in public opinion approval of the city. So we asked the PYP to allow us to see the raw data. They now refuse to allow it.
The problem with potentially bogus surveys is when they are used to try to influence public policy. The methodology and raw data should be transparent in every respect. Painting the city the way Mr. Studer’s survey did discourages others to invest, demoralizes elected officials and city staff and is highly damaging to the city. It fosters baseless criticism of city policy decisions and demeans good people who are doing good work. It is great however for bloggers like Outzen who need no substantive evidence to inflame their dozen or so followers.
So we make this public demand to PYP and Mr. Studer. Show us the raw data immediately so we can see how Mr. Studer’s survey reached the negative conclusion the PYP allowed to be published under their name. There was an old Pensacola lawyer back in the ’50s that filed some case papers with this legal conclusion: “On top of everything else it smells fishy.” Something doesn’t seem right about this PYP/Studer survey. When you decide to publish a survey that paints our city in a negative light, the persons who did it should have the intellectual honesty to show us the supporting raw data ( all of the details including the polling sampling method, the actual questions asked, age sex and residence of the person polled and much more), otherwise they should publicly withdraw it.
So now we have this very positive, objectively done, legitimate community survey conducted by the UWF. They have no ulterior motive and no axe to grind against the Mayor. This is a true picture of the city done with professional objective polling. The city is not perfect but it is doing pretty darn well. Most of the citizens are proud of the city and happy to live here.
The Haas Center submitted the results of its third annual City of Pensacola community survey to Mayor Hayward today. The survey is conducted to assess resident satisfaction with the delivery of major city services, help improve the quality of those services and determine budget priorities.
The survey results produced the following key findings:
• 69.3% of respondents said the City is headed in the right direction.
• The report identified three areas of concern, down from five in 2015.
• There was a 14% increase in the percentage of respondents who said they were “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the value of services provided by the City compared to the taxes they pay.
• The percentage of respondents who were “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the ease of obtaining information about City services rose by 21%.
“The faculty and staff at UWF are a tremendous resource for the city and we turn to them on a regular basis for research assistance and advice”, said Mayor Ashton Hayward. “The annual survey has developed into a great partnership between the City and the Haas Center.”
“Seeing that by a margin of 8 to 1, city residents are telling us that the city is on the right track, and that the City continues to get high marks for core services such as public safety, sanitation and city parks, I think these survey results validate that our priorities are aligned with the community’s expectations,” said Mayor Hayward. “The survey data is useful to us as we begin our budget planning process. There were a lot of positives in the survey, but it also showed us opportunities for improvement, especially around issues of infrastructure.”
The three city services that were identified in the report as “areas of concern” were stormwater infrastructure, streets and sidewalks. The City is taking active steps to address each one of them. Beginning in early 2017 and continuing for the next three years, the City will spend $13.8 million to resurface 1825 blocks of city streets. When the project is complete the overwhelming majority of city streets will have been resurfaced or reconstructed since 2005.
In the last three years the City has spent over $21 million on stormwater projects and that investment is now at a point where progress is readily visible. Some rain events that used to overwhelm the City’s stormwater system are now contained by it, flooding is minimized, and untreated runoff is prevented from flowing into Pensacola Bay. In response to residents’ ongoing concerns about stormwater management, city staff continues to research and apply for grants to enhance the City’s resiliency and has placed a priority on obtaining RESTORE funding for projects to reduce flood risks in the Long Hollow basin.
To address concerns about sidewalks the City is preparing to assess the condition of the entire network of sidewalks in order to identify and prioritize maintenance needs for existing sidewalks and locations for new construction. Money from Local Option Sales Tax proceeds will be used to pay for the prioritized list of projects.
The International City/County Management Association recommends citizen surveying as a way to bridge the gap between the government and citizens who vote, pay taxes, and make decisions about where to live and build their businesses but may not be able to attend council meetings or participate in public workshops. Surveys done by outside professionals help establish a neutral benchmark that all parties can accept and they come with analysis and explanation that put the results in perspective.
Conducted over a five-week period that began October 1, 2016, the mixed methods survey randomly sampled city residents. In total, 444 people completed the survey. That response level coincides with an approximate 4.6% margin of error. In other words, a sample of City of Pensacola residents will differ no more than +/-4.6% from a survey that included all City of Pensacola residents.
The complete report along with the survey instrument is available on the City’s website: City of Pensacola Document Center
About the Haas Center
The Haas Center is a research and consulting unit of the University of West Florida that specializes in applied business research, survey research and economic development. For over twenty years, the Center has led a wide range of research projects, including studies on economic and fiscal impacts, workforce development, industry clusters, feasibility analyses, demographic profiles and custom analytics.
The Florida Department of Transportation does what the governor wants done. The director keeps his job if the governor wants him to. We can only assume that the governor is indifferent to the planning and building disaster at I-10 and Scenic Highway, the fiasco of the three mile bridge contract award and the endless FDOT mistakes, like the Avalon Boulevard construction. The I-10/Scenic Highway mess is not only an awful sight, but it is highly dangerous as an unfenced retention pond.
So how does the FDOT get away with it? The same way they got away with handing us the worst possible design and the cheapest bidder for our new three mile bridge. The local politicians do what they are told to do by FDOT or FDOT will punish them by reallocating money away from the community. It is a fiefdom that operates outside the legislative appropriation process. They have their own “process” which is a system that operates better in the dark than a gaggle of swarming bats.
The Director never shows up in public to take responsibility for the disasters they cause.
We are a community of uneven highway lanes, the poorest highway construction contractors and neutered politicians that can do nothing about any of it. The incompetence of their three mile bridge contractor award is just beginning. We will face this FDOT decision for years with construction screw-ups and predictable major traffic congestion. They picked the cheapest contract bid after effectively eliminating world class bridge designers and builders by the way they set up the specifications for bidding. The FDOT used the money they saved on our three mile bridge contract for pet projects of powerful politicians in South Florida that FDOT needs to maintain this unchecked power of non-legislative appropriations. This is a corrupt system involving hundreds of millions of dollars and it was designed to do just what it is doing.
In the meantime they have sold these inane official blue and white lettered signs on the interstate to GEICO. The signs alert drivers that the upcoming rest stop is a “safe cell phone area” as if anyone needed that warning. Truth is they sold GEICO coveted interstate right of way signs and allowed them the same lettering as official FDOT signage. The irony will be when someone trying to read one of these signs plows into the car ahead of them.
The Democrats now eager to recount votes that will not change the outcome of the Presidential election are applauding the selection of their revered leader Nancy Pelosi. She is by far the worst possible person they could have elected to lead them. Mired in charges of insider dealing and profiteering she is the very face of the disgraced. Yet the Democrats hold on to her. They are clueless of the sentiment of many. Until they get a clue they are not going to win much.
In Florida they have provided one poor candidate after another for governor; maybe it’s time for Morgan. Nationally it is hopeless. The vast middle class who saw little hope for improvement in their lives with four more years of the Democrats turned to Trump. How can anyone blame them?
Innocence Project of Florida – Unlocking the truth…
Our thanks to all for participating in the naming survey for the YMCA apartment complex. The three finalists are:
1) Edatum (“A” is pronounced as in “take”)
2) Q – Family Village
3) Subsidy Place
Please have your votes in by the end of November. Our special thanks to the downtown business community for all their help in conducting the survey. Their response has been terrific.
For Victims’ Families, the Torment of Exoneration
Relatives say overturned convictions leave them feeling overlooked, afraid and even angry
By Kate King, Wall Street Journal, Nov. 7, 2016 12:03 a.m. ET (updated)
Andrea Harrison was buying lemonade at the Wawa store on Route 38 in southern New Jersey when the man who she had grown up believing killed her mother walked in the door.
Ms. Harrison had never met Larry Peterson, who spent nearly 18 years in prison for the murder before his conviction was overturned. But she had studied his picture from the state’s online criminal database.
“I walked out of that store so fast,” Ms. Harrison said of the encounter several years ago. “I was stunned.”
A judge threw out Mr. Peterson’s conviction in 2005, after DNA analysis discredited the forensic evidence used against him in his 1989 trial. Prosecutors haven’t charged anyone else.
“I still don’t have my mom,” Ms. Harrison said. “And now I don’t even have satisfaction in knowing that whoever did kill her is away and they can’t hurt anybody else, they can’t hurt me.”
There have been 1,913 exonerations nationwide since 1989, according to the National Registry of Exonerations. The registry estimates the wrongfully convicted have lost a total of 16,699 years behind bars. Stories about dubious convictions, such as the case profiled in the podcast “Serial,” have attracted cultlike followings and helped win new trials.
Meanwhile, a 2013 report commissioned by the National Institute of Justice was a rare look at the experiences of crime victims and their families in wrongful conviction cases.
Erin Williamson, who worked on the federal study as a consultant for ICF International, a consulting and technological services firm, said the families of murder victims told her they felt overlooked as they watched the media and members of the community rally around the wrongfully convicted.
“The victims kind of said, ‘No one’s realizing that this all happened because our family member was murdered,’ ” Ms. Williamson said.
Steven Barnes was convicted of the 1985 murder and sexual assault of 16-year-old Kim Simon in upstate New York. DNA analysis of evidence freed him from prison in 2008. He received a $3.5 million settlement from the state.
‘I’m just angry at the system that failed me. I hope there’s closure in this case so they can put it to rest.’
—Steven Barnes, who was exonerated for murder and sexual assault
Todd Simon was 12 when his sister was killed. Now 43 and living in Florida, Mr. Simon said he feared for his safety after learning Mr. Barnes had been exonerated and asked police whether his family would receive protection. Law-enforcement officers assured Mr. Simon that he wasn’t in danger, but he still worried that Mr. Barnes would blame him or his family for his incarceration.
“I still had in the back of my mind, what could happen if this person is angry?” said Mr. Simon.
Mr. Barnes, who was 23 when he went into prison and 42 when he was released, said he holds no animosity toward the Simon family.
“I’m just angry at the system that failed me,” he said, adding that he hasn’t talked with the Simon family since his exoneration. “I hope there’s closure in this case so they can put it to rest.”
The 2013 federal study found that fear is common among family members after the person they long believed killed their loved one is exonerated and released from prison, said Ms. Williamson, the consultant. “It’s very hard to suddenly flip a switch and think differently about that person,” she said. “That fear is very genuine.”
Mr. Barnes used part of his settlement to buy a house near his mother in Marcy, N.Y. The Oneida County District Attorney’s Office spent close to $500,000 reinvestigating the Simon murder after Mr. Barnes’ exoneration, but it remains unsolved. Mr. Simon said he and his parents, who are now in their 70s, doubt they will ever see the case closed.
“Our family gets nothing,” Mr. Simon said. “People forget that we were the victims.”
It is difficult to determine how many underlying criminal cases remain open after exonerations. The national registry doesn’t keep comprehensive statistics on how many cases are later solved.
In Brooklyn, a conviction review unit of nine prosecutors and three investigators has overturned 21 convictions since 2014. One was Antonio Yarbough, who spent nearly 22 years in prison after he was convicted of killing his mother, sister and a family friend.
Mr. Yarbough, who grew up in Coney Island, said he had a stable childhood even though his mother, Annie Yarbough, was a heroin addict. “If you didn’t know, you would think I had the perfect mom,” he said.
One summer morning in 1992, Mr. Yarbough, then 18, arrived home after a night out with friends and found his mother; his 12-year-old half-sister, Chavonn Barnes; and her friend, Latasha Knox, also 12. They had been tied up with electrical cords, garroted and stabbed multiple times.
Police charged Mr. Yarbough and one of his friends with the murders. Both were convicted and spent more than two decades in prison before they were exonerated in February 2014.
During his years behind bars, Mr. Yarbough said his anger toward the justice system was compounded by his feelings of guilt over not being home to protect his family the night they were murdered.
“I wasn’t accused of killing somebody else,” he said. “I was accused of killing the most important people in my life.”
Mr. Yarbough was released after a DNA sample found under his mother’s fingernails matched a sample found on a woman who was raped and murdered while Mr. Yarbough was in prison. He received a $3.6 million settlement from New York state, which he used to buy a small home on the outskirts of Queens. He is suing the New York City Police Department for violating his civil rights. A spokesman for the city Law Department declined to comment on the lawsuit.
The person whose DNA sample led to Mr. Yarbough’s exoneration remains unidentified, and the murders of his mother, sister and family friend are still unsolved. The NYPD didn’t respond to requests for comment on the status of the case.
“I want him to get locked up, I want him to go to trial,” Mr. Yarbough said, referring to the killer.
Wrongful conviction cases that involve DNA or other forensic evidence stand the best chance of seeing the crime solved. But the evidence that gets someone released from prison doesn’t always lead to another conviction, said Joe Giacalone, a retired New York police sergeant.
Mr. Giacalone, who was commanding officer of the Bronx Cold Case Squad, said older cases are more difficult to solve because witnesses die and records are lost. In many cases, the original investigators had “tunnel vision,” focusing too early on a person or group and neglecting to pursue other leads, he said.
“Exoneration cases become, unfortunately, cold cases times two in many respects, because there are no other suspects,” Mr. Giacalone said.
Andrea Harrison was 3 when her mother, Jacqueline Harrison, was found dead near a soybean field in New Jersey’s Pemberton Township on Aug. 24, 1987. An autopsy found that Jacqueline Harrison had been sexually assaulted and strangled to death. She was 25 with two daughters.
In 1989, Larry Peterson was tried, convicted, and sentenced to life in prison for the crime. Andrea Harrison said she grew up fixated on the loss of her mother but believed justice had been served. She was 21 when a judge threw out Mr. Peterson’s conviction and called for a new trial.
“We thought, OK, that was it. Case closed,” Ms. Harrison said. “And then this exoneration happened.”
Burlington County Prosecutor Robert Bernardi concluded that his office didn’t have strong enough evidence to retry Mr. Peterson and asked the court to dismiss the charges.
“At this time there are no other identified suspects in this heinous crime,” Mr. Bernardi wrote in a 2006 report outlining his decision.
Mr. Peterson couldn’t be reached for comment. He was the first person in New Jersey exonerated in a homicide case based on DNA analysis and won a $1 million settlement from the state. In 2013 he was arrested for allegedly threatening to kill his ex-girlfriend, according to court records. The charges were dismissed the following year.
At the time of her death, Jacqueline Harrison was dating Dwayne Jones, Andrea Harrison’s father. They had plans to marry, but Jacqueline Harrison “was involved in some stuff that she shouldn’t have been,” Mr. Jones said. He believes she went out with other drug users from the neighborhood on the night she was murdered.
“I wish they would have found out who did it,” Mr. Jones said.
Mr. Bernardi declined through a spokesman to comment.
Vanessa Potkin, an Innocence Project attorney who represented Mr. Peterson, said both crime victims and the wrongfully convicted deserve justice.
“It’s horrific enough to lose a family member, to add to that injury, finding out decades later that the wrong person was incarcerated—that can be unbearable,” Ms. Potkin said. “There is no finality in a case if an innocent person has been convicted and the true assailant is left unapprehended.”
Mr. Jones still lives in southern New Jersey, but the social gatherings that he used to enjoy have been clouded since Mr. Peterson’s exoneration. Today, Mr. Jones suspects people from the community have information about Jacqueline Harrison’s murder but don’t want to share it with police.
“They’re breaking bread with you and still keeping this big, deep dark secret,” said Mr. Jones.
Andrea Harrison, now 32, lives in Maryland with her 9-year-old daughter, Lavender. She can no longer remember the shape of her mother’s face or the sound of her voice. For the past three Christmases, she has asked her aunts for photographs of her mother. They sit on the mantel in her living room.
“Tell me about my mom, tell me what happened to her,” Andrea Harrison said. “I think I want to know, as long as it culminates with them being prosecuted and put away.”
Write to Kate King at Kate.King@wsj.com
From the Washington Post, 09/08/2016…
Officer threw black teen ‘like a child’s doll’ during parking lot encounter, lawsuit claims
Surveillance video of the 2014 incident shows a 15-year-old girl pedaling a bike through a mall parking lot in Washington State.
An off-duty officer in an SUV pulls up from behind and stops the girl, who was with her brother. The girl, Monique Tillman, asked the officer why the pair had been stopped, according to an amended lawsuit complaint filed in Pierce County Superior Court.
The Tacoma police officer, identified in the lawsuit as Jared Williams, told Tillman and her brother, Eric Branch, that they were causing a disturbance, the lawsuit alleges — something that Tillman disputed.
Tillman, who is black, told authorities that she thought she was “being harassed because of the color of her skin,” the lawsuit states. After a back-and-forth, Tillman claims she tried to pedal away.
Instead, the lawsuit states, the officer “erupted” and “began brutalizing” the teen. He “tossed Plaintiff Tillman around like a child’s doll, slamming her into parked vehicles, forcefully shoving his hand and forearm into her chest, grabbing her by the hair and body slamming her into the pavement,” the complaint claims.
When Tillman was on the ground, the officer used a stun gun on her, the complaint states. Her brother, “horrified” by the scene, tried to help. But according to the lawsuit, he was threatened with the stun gun, too.
In the wake of the incident, Tillman has suffered nightmares, fears incarceration and distrusts police officers, the lawsuits states. According to the lawsuit, Williams was “working as a Tacoma police officer and in an off-duty capacity” in a private security job at the time the incident occurred.
“She says it best herself, and that is she doesn’t feel secure,” her attorney, Vito de la Cruz, said in a phone interview. “She is frightened of police officers and doesn’t feel like she is safe.”
Tillman was arrested after the May 2014 incident but the charges she faced were dismissed by a judge, according to the Seattle Times, which reports that the lawsuit was initially filed earlier this year. The lawsuit — in which Tillman claims her civil rights were violated during the encounter with police and security guards — has now been amended and expanded.
The Times reports that this happened “after a spokeswoman for Tacoma police told reporters that though Williams was off duty and working as a security guard, he still had police authority to make the arrest.”
According to a news release from de la Cruz, the amended complaint now includes the Tacoma police department, its chief, and two other defendants, another officer and a security guard.
“Given that Officer Williams’ conduct was committed under color of law as a police officer for the Tacoma Police Department, the Plaintiffs have alleged federal and state civil rights violations in their amended complaint,” the release states. “At the core of the complaint is the excessive force used and illegal arrest made by Tacoma Police Officer Williams and others against Ms. Tillman and her brother Eric Branch.”
The lawsuit, in which Branch is also a plaintiff, alleges that officials “routinely approve or ratify abusive, excessive, and unnecessary uses of force” and fail to take action against officers who go too far.
Authorities allow officers who “abuse citizens and violate their rights” to remain employed, and “routinely charge arrestees with acts of resistance or violence when the officers have used violence against the arrestee, regardless of merit,” the lawsuit states.
“I think it’s important to stress that police officers are there to protect and serve the community,” de la Cruz said. “And in situations such as this, when excessive force was clearly used, the video speaks for itself, they must be held accountable and policies must change. For too long, the African American community and other communities of color have felt that they’re not protected when they’re out and have police encounters.
“These two children were riding their bikes and that was all they were doing. And they’re African-American, and that seems to have been the reason why they were stopped. At least a prime motivator for it.”
Williams is white, according to the Associated Press.
The lawsuit comes at a time of increased tensions between law enforcement officers and the communities they serve. Across the country, many are debating the use of force, police tactics and the interactions between law enforcement and black citizens.
Earlier this summer, fatal police shootings in Louisiana and Minnesota stirred continued unrest, while the fatal shootings of officers in Dallas stoked fears about the dangers faced by those who work in law enforcement. More recently, NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick has protested by taking a knee during the national anthem, an effort to raise awareness of racial injustice. He has been joined by soccer star Megan Rapinoe, though her act of protest was preempted earlier this week.
A message left with a Tacoma police spokesman was not immediately returned Thursday.
This November, “Amendment 1” (The Solar Energy Amendment) will be on the Florida ballot. We have all heard the radio commercials and seen the TV ads promoting “solar energy choice” and growing solar “the right way” protecting the “rights of consumers.” Not so fast.
The November ballot Amendment 1 is being funded by big power companies. Duke Energy (Florida), Tampa Electric, FP&L (Florida Power & Light) and, yes, Gulf Power. Why would all of these big power companies support the passing of this amendment?
– Florida Supreme Court Justice Barbara Pariente warned us all that Amendment 1 is a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” that “actually seeks to constitutionalize the status quo.” Meaning gaining monopoly control over solar power by the existing power companies.
– Florida statutes and regulations already allow for the use solar energy by individuals. This amendment is a fraud on Florida voters. You will not find a single Gulf Power Executive that will own up to responsibility for what they are trying to pull off. Not one – none nada.
How can we tell if a state constitutional amendment is good for consumers? A good indicator is who funds this one, not consumer advocates it is the power companies. These companies dutifully operate our electric power systems. They do a good job and we appreciate and respect them for it. We want them to make a reasonable profit. This Amendment One scam however is beneath the dignity of every Gulf Power employee save the management responsible for it. Millions spent to convince us to give them control over our solar power. Dishonest and intentionally deceptive advertising to take away from us what we now have a right to possess, a new low for our power companies.
According to our list of Public Record Requests, in 2016, Mr. Outzen has managed to equal his record request total from the previous three years, making over fifty requests this year alone (see image below this post). He always copies an employee of the State Attorney’s office with his requests suggesting he has their support, which is simply false. He can copy the President of the United States if he wants to and there is nothing anyone can do about it, but the reason he copies an employee of the State Attorney is to create the impression the State Attorney is supporting the request. Yesterday he announced on radio that “the State Attorney does not seem particularly interested in Sunshine violations.” Unfair and not true. Mr. Eddins’ assistant state attorneys have vigorously enforced violations of the public records laws. Mr. Outzen has kicked the wrong dog accusing the State Attorney of indifference to violations of law.
He has recently filed criminal charges against the Mayor of the City of Pensacola which were determined to be groundless. He has previously filed a false criminal complaint accusing an unknown person of committing cyber stalking which was patently ridiculous and filed solely to learn the identity of the author of “Dick’s Blog” — which had previously observed Mr. Outzen was not a journalist.
Mr. Outzen certainly has a right to file public record requests, but his almost every-other-day requests seem excessive. Mr. Outzen, who lives in Gulf Breeze, pays no Pensacola City or Escambia County land taxes, apparently has no reservation in making the City of Pensacola incur all these staff charges to produce records. His rage seems oddly myopically focused on the Mayor of the City of Pensacola. When he obtains the records he requests he does nothing with them because there has been no wrong doing by city staff or the Mayor’s office. In the meantime legitimate news agencies and private citizens are delayed getting their public records requests answered.
Far worse is the relentless bashing of our city (not his) and the negative image he seems hell bent to keep advancing. We need good jobs and businesses to locate here. Next time you see his weekly paper think about the harm he causes us all in our efforts to reach that goal.
“Some of these concerns were not wholly unfounded. Some were patently absurd.”
So reads a Pensacola News Journal editorial regarding the many questions that were raised about Senator Gaetz qualifications for the presidency of UWF. Sadly the PNJ writer offers no example of either. What does it mean to say not wholly unfounded? Is the writer of the editorial suggesting some concerns were unfounded? The PNJ owes it to the faculty, the students, the trustees and the public to provide the facts supporting this editorial writer’s opinion. What concerns were absurd? Which person made an absurd charge? What was it? What were the unfounded concerns? What were the well-founded concerns?
It takes 20 minutes to fire off an editorial where the writer makes no effort to prove what they are writing. Yes, it is an opinion and no you don’t have to have any factual basis for it, but this is not a weekly blog, this is a Gannett newspaper. Will the writer please stand up and identify him or herself and provide us with a bit more detail?
Andy Marlette also criticized Governor Scott with a bombastic editorial attack. Does anyone know though what information the Governor had about Senator Gaetz that he could not disclose publicly? How can anyone rationally reach the conclusion that what the Governor did was petty retaliation politics? No one knows what the Governor said to any trustee — if anything. Maybe he saved UWF an embarrassment that none of us, including the PNJ, understood.
It is easy to understand the cabal boys spreading this baseless rumor, but the PNJ? You could only reach that editorial conclusion if you were a big Don Gaetz supporter and upset he was not selected. Few responsible newspaper writers would malign the Governor of this state with absolutely no factual support.
HOW TO BE A GOOD WIFE
Have dinner ready. Plan ahead, even the night before, to have a delicious meal on time. This is a good way of letting him know that you have been thinking about and are concerned· about his needs. Most men are hungry when they come home and the prospect of a good meal is part of the warm welcome needed.
Prepare yourself. Take fifteen minutes to rest so that you will be refreshed when he arrives. Touch up you makeup, put a ribbon in your hair and be fresh looking. He has just been with a lot of work-weary people. Be a little gay and a little more interesting. His boring day may need a lift.
Clear away the clutter. Make one last trip through the main part of the house just before your husband arrives, gathering up school books, toys, paper, etc. Then run a dust cloth over the tables. Your husband will feel he has reached a haven of rest and order, and it will give you a lift, too.
Prepare the children. Take a few minutes to wash the children’s hands and faces (if they are small), comb their hair, and if necessary, change their clothes. They are little treasures and he would like to see them playing the part.
Minimize all noise. At the time of his arrival, eliminate all noise of the washer, dryer, dishwasher, or vacuum. Try to encourage the children to be quiet. Be happy to see him and greet him with a warm smile.
Listen to him. You may have a dozen things to tell him, but the moment of his arrival is not the time. Let him talk first.
Make the evening his. Never complain if he does not take you out to dinner or to other pleasant entertainment. Instead try to understand his world of strain and pressure, his need to unwind and relax. Make him comfortable. Have him lean back in a comfortable chair or suggest that he lie down in the bedroom. Have a cool or warm drink ready for him. Arrange his pillow and offer to take. off his shoes. Speak in a low, soft, soothing and pleasant voice. Allow him to relax and unwind.
Some don’ts: Don’t greet him with problems and complaints. Don’t complain if he is late for dinner. Count this as minor compared to what he might have gone through that day.
The goal: To make you home a place of peace and order where your husband can relax in body and spirit.
(The preceding was excerpted from a 1950 high school Home Economics textbook.)
Rick Outzen was interviewing Mr. Studer on Outzen’s radio show and the two of them were lamenting the terrible negativity associated with the UWF presidential search. They mix exposing the truth with baseless criticism. Now isn’t this a pretty picture? Mr. Negative interviewing the guy who gives $$ to politicians who give him tax breaks. If you mention it they whine that you are negative. Mr. Studer says we need to get passed this in our community. We will when high profile people conduct themselves honorably. Till then pointing out dishonorable conduct or politically rigged deals really needs to continue.
In this community (where Outzen does not live), what we really need to do is to expose all of the hypocrisy by people claiming to be benevolent community benefactors. Go ahead and do good, just don’t brag about it. That would be a good start.
There was a troubling disclosure From Ms. Suzanne Lewis at the UWF Board of Trustees meeting yesterday. She said that someone from Greenwood–Asher (the search firm) had recently contacted her polling her ranking of the candidates. Dr. Greenwood remained silent after Ms. Lewis made that disclosure. Why would the search firm be trying to ascertain how a Trustee was going to rank candidates before the Trustees had any information about the candidates? (Which is an euphemistic way of asking how they were going to vote.) What other Trustees were contacted? Who did Greenwood–Asher provide their polling information to? The search firm was not tasked with conducting a ranking poll before the finalists names were given to the Trustees or at any other time.
The Trustees should determine how the foregoing occurred and why. It was the intellectual integrity of the individual board members displayed by their comments that was the highlight of the day. They should now ascertain what actually happened with the Greenwood-Asher polling of the Trustees. More to the point, why would a search firm ever conduct such a poll unless they were asked to do so? If so, who asked them?
Looks like the Pensacola News Journal had the Gaetz victory story already to go. Then the headline changed — but the picture didn’t…
In an effort to replicate the surveying of Pensacola’s Young Prostitutes, we have conducted our own unscientific polling that violates every possible aspect of a valid polling. Here are our results:
In regard to Mr. Studer…
Do you believe he should stop running half page ads extolling how wonderful he is?
Yes – 11 %
No – 6 %
Never read the ads – 83 %
Do you believe he should pay more in taxes and lease fees to help pay $60 million debt the city has to pay starting in 2017 for his ballpark?
Yes – 31 %
No – 6 %
Had no idea the city owed $60 million – 66 %
Do you believe candy is good for little kids?
Yes – 67 %
No – 6 %
Only if it is free – 27 %
Do you believe Mr. Studer wants to run the entire city?
Yes – 51 %
No – 6 %
Just the downtown portion – 44 %
Yesterday was show and tell for Don Gaetz at his search committee reception. Staged speakers appeared asking softball questions preceded by lavish praise for Mr. Gaetz. A modern day filibuster against substance. The room was packed with cheering fans with the exception of one or two contrarians who were dismissed.
These staged speakers made to look independent are exactly what happened with the hearings for redistricting which Mr. Gaetz personally organized. When does the charade become too much for the independent of the Trustees to accept?
“It was the Other Guy—Not Me” (10/22/2015)
“Time for Gaetz to Apologize” (10/27/2015)
“Gaetz Senate Trial Continues” (12/17/2015)
Don Gaetz told this to the committee in regards to the pending lawsuit (read the entire complaint here) against his former company:
“It is also in the public domain that the company I joined with two others in founding has a challenge from the federal government because the Feds say that some of their patients lived too long. It is a hospice company supposed to take care of people 6 months or less. Some of these people got such good care they lived a little too long. So the federal government said that was not the plan. So now there is an audit going on with that. My understanding is that will be concluded very favorably for the company. But it is an audit that I had nothing to do with and over which I have no control.”
What does this answer mean? Is Mr. Gaetz unaware his former company is being sued by the United States of America?
Indeed, the Federal Government may have “challenged” his company, and his former company may be doing an audit including evaluation of the time he was an officer with the company. And yes the company internal audit may find it all quite fine. But, the truthful answer is his former company is being sued by the United States Government for fraud. Fraud involving the most offensive conduct: Cheating the Federal Government involving sick, elderly and dying people. The lawsuit is not going away; it is set for trial in February 2018. Was Don Gaetz with this company when the alleged fraud was ongoing? How in the world could the search committee accept this answer without any further questions? (See video clip below, 13:05 – 13:46) They should take him through every single allegation in the lawsuit and ask him to respond. This politically selected committee may elect to refuse to inquire about Mr. Gaetz redistricting fraud but how can they avoid asking about this lawsuit?
It is ironic that the search criteria for UWF presidential search includes an “experience credit.” This credit the search terms provide may be “superior” to a terminal degree, the offering of which is product of an accredited university. Among the educated in higher education, this “experience credit” is generally advertised available in the pay-for degrees offered online or found acceptable in junk colleges from strip-mall campuses. The search criteria doesn’t define what the experience could be that would be superior to a terminal degree. It’s not a conspiracy theory to observe that declaring “experience” could be superior to a terminal degree was included for Don Gaetz who only has a master’s degree from Troy.
Would it be rude to ask though: If it is not experience in post-secondary education, what type of experience would be superior to a terminal degree? Is this the first new step towards preeminent status? Is experience credit towards UWF degrees next?
From The Pulse
August 22, 2016
Late last year, State Representative Matt Gaetz came to the rescue after Pensacola developers Quint and Rishy Studer said they wouldn’t move forward with a planned $50 million mixed use development in downtown Pensacola without a tax break that was set to expire.
At the Studers’ request, Gaetz inserted language into a bill clarifying that projects like the Studer development, which previously qualified for the incentive under Florida’s now-defunct enterprise zone rules, can continue to receive it going forward. The tax break — what’s called an EDATE, or economic ad valorem tax exemption — will reduce the Studer’s tax obligations for the project by an estimated $5 million or more over a ten-year period.
In April, Governor Rick Scott signed the bill into law, and the Studers announced the project — a mixed-use residential and commercial development located on the former site of the Pensacola News Journal headquarters — was back on. Studer has said the 258-unit development will generate an estimated $65 million in new investment, 600 construction jobs, and as many as 150 permanent jobs.
Now, with Gaetz running for Congress to replace the retiring Jeff Miller, the Studers have contributed nearly $40,000 to Gaetz’s campaign accounts and a pro-Gaetz political action committee since the beginning of the year.
The couple’s largest contribution has been $25,000 to North Florida Neighbors, the federal “super PAC” supporting Gaetz’s congressional campaign. The couple each also gave the federal maximum of $5,400 to Gaetz’s campaign committee. The $25,000 super PAC contribution came about a month after Governor Scott signed the tax bill into law. The Studers had not previously donated to any of Gaetz’s campaigns.
Studer did not respond to a request for comment Monday, but told POLITICO Florida that the contributions did not represent a quid pro quo. “Matt and I have spoken several times at Blue Wahoos games, but this was the first time I was able to watch him work as a legislator,” Studer told POLITICO. “I was immediately impressed with how he worked to fix this statewide EDATE issue. Following the legislative session, when he announced his plans to run for Congress, I looked for a way to support his campaign.”
Despite Studer’s comments, campaign finance records show that the Studers, along with their Studer Properties LLC, contributed $3,000 to Gaetz’s state senate campaign on January 11 — about a month before Gaetz filed the bill and two months before the legislative session ended in March. Gaetz switched to the congressional race shortly thereafter when Jeff Miller announced he would not seek reelection.
In a statement released after Governor Scott signed the bill in April, the Studers thanked the area’s entire legislative delegation but singled out Gaetz for special praise. “We are very grateful to local legislative Representatives Clay Ingram and Mike Hill, as well as State Senator Greg Evers,” Studer said. “We especially are grateful to Representative Matt Gaetz whose leadership in writing the language and support was crucial.”
The Studer project is expected to be completed by the end of 2017.
– by DEREK COSSON, founding partner & managing editor of The Pulse. Original article here.
Related Blog — Matt Gaetz, Super PAC & “Pay-to-Play”
When Don Gaetz said he would support anything Lewis Bear asked him to legislatively support it seemed Mr. Gaetz was a tad too enthusiastic. That was in 2014. Likely long before then Mr. Gaetz had his eye on the UWF presidency. Lewis Bear was and is chairman of the board of trustees.
Then an announcement was made that Dr. Bense was going to remain as President for another year. Speculation was that it was to accommodate Mr. Gaetz ending his senate term so he could apply for the presidency of UWF. Then Mr. Bear chose the nominating committee. His de facto assistant, Collier Merrill, a member of the search committee, has repeatedly said he favors Mr. Gaetz appointment without knowing who else might apply. At first Mr. Bear had no faculty named to the committee; eventually he allowed only four faculty appointments. Among the non-faculty appointees was a former employee of Mr. Gaetz and a man Mr. Gaetz had nominated for appointment to the Okaloosa Walton Community College Board of Trustees. This man does not appear to have any connection to UWF (see letter below). Mr. Bear was picked by the Governor for Enterprise Florida based on Mr. Gaetz’s recommendation. In the meantime not a single member of the Board of Trustees of UWF registered any public complaint about Mr. Bear’s composition of the search committee or the selection of the search firm that was hired.
On August 15th, Mr. Gaetz formally submitted his application to the search committee. The only relevant question is: Why in the world didn’t they just hire Mr. Gaetz outright and save the time and money from what they are doing now?
It is no secret that the power that runs the University of West Florida is geared up to make Don Gaetz the next President. It wouldn’t take ten minutes to figure that out looking at a majority of the search committee membership. It may be that Greenwood-Asher selected as the search firm is coincidentally located in Miramar, Florida in Okaloosa County, but it does not have the best appearance given Senator Gaetz home county of Okaloosa.
Then there is this special invitation letter to the people listed (see image below). Senator Gaetz used the UWF Argo Club ostensibly to introduce community leaders to Senator Negron. Several of these people are either on the search committee or the board of trustees. However, all members of the search committee were not invited and all members of the board of trustees were not invited. The major community leaders were not invited, the mayor of Pensacola, the chairman of the Escambia County Commission, nor were other elected officials and community leaders. Senator Gaetz has never explained why he invited who he did. The University noticed the meeting a few days before it occurred, but there was no widespread publicity about the meeting. These invited guests were seated around a connected square table arrangement; any member of the public who went to observe did so, but were not allowed to sit at the table designated for the invited guests.
It may be that Senator Gaetz never applies for the job. If he does however, it will require the immediate disqualification and removal from the search committee or the board of trustees of every one of these special guests who received this letter invitation and attended this meeting. Not a single one of these invited guests asked Senator Gaetz at this meeting if he was planning on applying for the position of the President of UWF, yet that was the most obvious question that should have been asked by each of these people. Had he said he might apply, they should not have attended if they were serving on the presidential search committee or as a member of the board of trustees.
UWF Presidential Search Committee
Mort O’Sullivan, Chair
C. Wayne Ansley
K. C. Clark
Dr. Pamela Dana
Dan Doyle, Jr.
Dr. Steven J. Kass
Dr. Eric Kollar
Jay S. Patel
Bentina C. Terry
The Huffington Post
August 5, 2016
Written by Paul Blumenthal
This Super PAC Is Funded By Groups Once Run
By The Candidate It Now Supports
That could be a problem.
Two PACs once connected to Florida state Rep. Matt Gaetz contributed to a super PAC now supporting his congressional candidacy.
WASHINGTON — Three days before Florida Republican state Rep. Matt Gaetz announced his intention to run for an open seat in Congress, he sent two letters to the state’s Division of Elections formally stepping down as the chairman of two leadership PACs he had run for over two years. Three months later, those two PACs contributed all of their remaining funds to a super PAC supporting his congressional bid.
These donations are yet another sign of the porous rules restricting coordination between campaigns and independent groups. Whether the PAC contributions to the pro-Gaetz super PAC amount to violations of Federal Election Commission rules governing coordination depends on the as-yet-unknown facts of the case.
The contributions in question include a $369,008 donation from the Economic Freedom Foundation and a $11,306 contribution from the Free Enterprise Fund. Both are political action committees registered with the Florida Division of Elections. They were led by Gaetz from 2013 until he stepped down as chairman and named Amanda Clark as his replacement on March 18, 2016. On March 21, he announced his congressional bid.
Under Clark’s leadership, the two PACs filed papers with the Florida Division of Elections to formally terminate operations on May 26. Then on June 20 they contributed their remaining funds to North Florida Neighbors, a federally registered super PAC.
North Florida Neighbors was created in July 2015 with a stated goal of supporting the congressional campaign of Republican Neal Dunn in Florida’s 2nd Congressional District.
One of the group’s first contributions was actually a $10,000 donation from Gaetz’s Economic Freedom Foundation.
At the time, Gaetz was running for the state Senate seat currently occupied by his retiring father, Don Gaetz. It wasn’t until Rep. Jeff Miller (R-Fla.) announced that he was retiring from Congress that the younger Gaetz dropped the bid to replace his father in the state Senate and threw his hat into the race to represent Florida’s 1st Congressional District in Washington.
On May 20, North Florida Neighbors announced that they would now be supporting Gaetz’s campaign along with Dunn’s — conveniently running in neighboring districts in Florida’s panhandle. One month later, the super PAC received the $380,314 in contributions from the two PACs formerly led by Gaetz. These contributions amount to 65 percent of the total funds raised by the super PAC.
North Florida Neighbors has since spent $292,262 to support Gaetz in the eight-candidate Republican primary in the 1st District.
The question at issue is whether Gaetz directed his successor at his two leadership PACs, Amanda Clark, on what to do with the remaining funds. Neither the Gaetz campaign nor
Clark responded to requests for comment.
Federal coordination rules prohibit any entity controlled by a candidate from making independent expenditures on their behalf. Although untested, those rules presumably extend to prohibit contributions from a leadership PAC controlled or directed by a candidate to a super PAC supporting that candidate.
“If what happened was that he raised the money to these state organizations and then he said ‘transfer money over to the super PAC,’ that would be illegal,” Larry Noble, general counsel to the Campaign Legal Center, told The Huffington Post. “What they always say, though, is that they had nothing to do with it.”
Christina Johnson, spokeswoman for North Florida Neighbors, simply stated, “We don’t comment on specific contributions or donors.”
This is not the first time that a candidate-linked leadership PAC has contributed to a super PAC supporting the same candidate. In 2015, a leadership PAC connected to Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Penn.) donated $75,000 to Prosperity for Pennsylvania, a super PAC run by former Toomey aides. The super PAC, however, refunded the Toomey leadership PAC contributions more than a month after The Huffington Post wrote about them. That was before the super PAC spent a dime on Toomey’s election.
~ Paul Blumenthal is the Money in Politics Reporter for The Huffington Post. Original Article Here.
August 8, 2016
Written by Tom McLaughlin
PAC Funds Prove Controversial for Gaetz
Republican District 1 candidate Cris Dosev: “This is pay for play, quid pro quo. You want to play, you pay. These people have paid to play and now they’re paying some more.”
In the last two election cycles, state Rep. Matt Gaetz has counted on a leadership PAC called the Economic Freedom Foundation to influence local election campaigns.
Before beginning his run for Congress earlier this year, Gaetz resigned as chairman of the Economic Freedom Foundation as well as the Free Enterprise Fund, another PAC he chaired.
Soon thereafter, both organizations turned over all of their assets, $380,314, to a Super PAC supporting Gaetz in his run for Florida’s District 1 seat in the U.S. House.
Gaetz, R-Fort Walton Beach, maintains that he resigned as chair of the organizations he used in 2012 and 2014 to fund opponents of sitting Okaloosa County Commissioners because federal election law dictated that he do so.
He said he has had no contact with the PACs, or their new chair Amanda Clark, since he cut ties on March 18.
Gaetz was therefore unaware, he said, that on May 26 Clark filed papers with the state to shut down the Economic Freedom Foundation and the Free Enterprise Fund.
Or that on June 20 the funds left over in both accounts were contributed to a Super PAC called North Florida Neighbors.
“At the time I filed for office I was legally required to resign from the committees I led. I did so and have had no correspondence or communication with that committee since,”
Gaetz said. “All decisions made would have been made by the new head of that organization.”
Efforts to reach Clark on Monday were unsuccessful.
The Huffington Post first reported on and questioned the timing of the funds moving from Gaetz’s former committees to the Super PAC he shares with fellow Republican congressional hopeful Neal Dunn.
“Federal coordination rules prohibit any entity controlled by a candidate from making independent expenditures on their behalf,” the article said.
Gaetz said he’s been “viciously attacked” by the Huffington Post before.
“It’s no surprise the Huffington Post would attack a Panhandle conservative,” he said.
But the financial maneuvering also gave those running against Gaetz room to question big money politics.
“It’s one thing to have a Super PAC come in on their side, but coordinating, that’s against the law,” said fellow Republican District 1 candidate Cris Dosev. “One day that money’s in a state account and the next it ends up in a Super PAC.”
Dosev said the congressional race should be about “credibility, experience and maturity” and not money.
Fellow Republican candidate James Zumwalt said “it is incumbent on all voters to research all of the candidates and not just the ones they see more on television.”
Steven Specht, the single Democrat in the race for the District 1 seat, said the timing of the money movement points out the need for a bipartisan congressional review of campaign finance laws.
Gaetz rebutted the comments of his opponents by pointing out that he has raised more money from in-district donors than the other seven candidates combined. He noted that Dosev, a former Marine with Illinois roots, has received significant donations from Peoria.
Candidate Rebecca Johansen Bydlak, Gaetz said, has received donations from Washington D.C.
Dosev countered that many Gaetz donors are men and women who have received favors from Gaetz as a state House members.
“This is pay for play, quid pro quo,” Dosev said. “You want to play, you pay. These people have paid to play and now they’re paying some more.”
~ Tom McLaughlin, nwfdailynews.com, Original article here.
(on above article from nwfdailynews.com, as of August 9, 2016 4:30PM)
While NWF voters wring their hands over same-ole, same-ole crooked politics, they keep on electing same-ole, same-ole crooked politicians.
He is NOT going to win the election and he knows it. He’ll try anything now. Moving that money to the PAC puts it back in his hands for the election. This should be illegal.
Gaetz you need to leave florida for good and stop pretending to be somebody your are not. Please do not vote this guy in!! Like the article mentioned “do your own research before you place your vote” Ps. His smile is even crooked in this picture.
Cris Dosev for Congress has identified itself as the only candidate that is willing and able to tenaciously go after career politicians and the slick moves they try to pull over on the citizens for which they are supposed to work. If you think this needs to happen in Washington, then send the candidate that will fight. He has proven his intentions.
Gregory E. Johnson:
Surprisingly NOT mentioned in this article is the fact Amanda Clark, Chairperson of the PAC “North Florida Neighbors” is in fact the spouse of Chris Clark, who is Chief of Staff for Florida State Senator Don Gaetz. So, I guess one could think Northwest Florida has it’s very own “Clinton” style family; that being the Gaetz folks who just like the Clinton’s have their fingers in everything spreading their influence far and wide!
Seems Dosev is the only candidate with any real integrity. The rest of these rats have never earned anything by way of honest work, so they manipulate government for their own financial reward. Dosev, on the other hand, is a self-made man who doesn’t need this job, but chooses to pursue it in order to help our citizens. Instead of choosing yet another sneaky, self-serving insider, choose someone with good character. Cris Dosev is that man.
We all read the effusive praise bestowed on Matt Gaetz by Mr. Studer for getting Mr. Studer’s EDATE passed which over ten years will save him millions in city taxes. Making a $25,000 contribution to Matt Gaetz PAC (as reported by Politico) would seem a modest gesture of thanks and certainly does not have the appearance of a dollar-for-dollar quid pro quo.
The Washington Post online video featured Satan’s representative at a recent Pensacola City Council meeting. Mr. Charles Bare was seen presiding with his patriotic tie and the city “CEO” was seen, arms folded, behind the hooded chanter, ready to defend the honor of the area preachers counter-chanting on the front row their love of, well, everybody but the evil one with the hood.
This will have no adverse impact on company executives thinking about moving here and bringing jobs…
Publix may have had a right to build the monstrosity they are building that fronts on Cervantes at 12th Avenue, but they had other choices. They could have abandoned their standard big box design and built something compatible with the neighborhood. Instead they have ruined the neighborhood and created an eyesore for us all to see whenever we drive by on Cervantes Street. It looks like a 40 ft. windowless prison wall built right next to the street. The only thing missing is a chain link fence with razor wire, but there is no room to put it between the building and the sidewalk.
The people with homes across the street now look at the Publix Prison wall…
Publix, like a bad neighbor, is here to stay.
This is what they were supposed to build (renderings released October 2015):
(Originally posted October 14, 2015)
For Democrats it is not a pretty picture.
Even the audience for the debate (October 13, 2015) was corrupted by the Clintons. Why does anyone who watched the debate care what cheers and jeers came from the audience? It was all Clinton Theatre.
Everyone sees what they want to see in Hillary. For me, I see someone who is dishonest on all fronts, on all subjects, all the time. She and her husband have amassed a fair fortune from his speeches. The conflict she had as Secretary of State with Bill’s fees for speeches to foreign payers is troubling. And that’s putting it mildly. Last night, a rehearsed statement by Bernie Sanders that the American people didn’t care about her emails, may be his opinion, but it is neither mine nor the opinion of many others.
It is in the nature of politics that lies are told. Hillary Clinton however, has topped them all with her account of “off server” official State Department emails. She intentionally created a shadow email system to conceal official emails from government servers and from the American people. No one on that stage said one critical word about it. To dismiss this as of little concern to the American people is, in a word preposterous.
Not a single person on that stage rocked the Clinton boat in the slightest. The Clintons have nailed down the nomination for her and everyone knows it. Joe Biden would be a good man to run but, it is over. We have her. There is nothing anyone can do about it.
Let’s see who the Republican’s end up nominating.* There may be a lot more Democratic defectors than people think.
— Bob Kerrigan
*As mentioned earlier, this was written and posted October 14, 2015. At the time, there were still 14 GOP candidates for President with Ben Carson and Donald Trump leading in the polls. Read the original post here.
Ms. Myers is right. Many of these City and County boards need to be either eliminated or have their purpose better defined. For years the word on the street was when you need something from one of these boards, hire a board member or their relatives. That was especially true with the ARB. Boards can also serve as buffers protecting politicians who want to do favors for constituents but don’t want their fingerprints on the decision.
Now who could possibly think that a board member should be able to represent the interests of their clients before the board upon which they serve? The fiction that has been used in the past is the board member who is making the pitch for their client doesn’t vote on the client’s request. What about very basic conflicts of interest like personal friendships between a board member and the person making the request of the board? What about business benefits either prior or future dealings between the board members and the requester?
It may be that a given board might have some community benefit, but the appearance of conflicts and competing loyalties generally far outweigh any benefit that these boards can provide. Yes, there are occasionally people with no conflicts who serve on these boards and I am sure there are others who do it for the benefit of the community. But, the fact they agree to serve on boards where other members have these glaring conflicts indicts them equally.
The City Council should make zero based board assessments. The presumption should be we do not want them but if we have them they must not be riddled with these board member conflicts. It seems simple enough. If you want to help the community by serving on a board you can’t use the board for personal benefit directly or indirectly.
The FDOT will hold a special unveiling of their preferred contractors, not here where the communities will be impacted by their decision, but where?
In Chipley — a town with one red light.
So unless we rent a bus of interested citizens and drive two hours, their unveiling party will be sparsely attended which, of course, is the why they will do it in Chipley. Just when we thought the insulting and degrading manner in which the FDOT operates couldn’t get much worse, they set the bar of accountability a notch lower.
We are delivering a case of Kleenex for the City Council. These tissues can be used any time they lament their waning significance while wringing their hands sobbing that no one is paying any attention to them.
While recently declaring that the city is in open rebellion and chaos is in full at City Hall, they have only the deranged bloggers who will listen to them. Even though they pay their “CEO” more money than the Mayor, they know that deep down he shares their profound grief and despair and as tough as he is even an ex-cop can cry boo-hoo, too.
And one of their number will soon fade to obscurity leaving no one to lead them to their dream of privileged free parking. While they weep over the fall of the City that leaves them no time to take care of the problems of the peasants, like the food trucks.
“Let them eat Sushi” say our town criers!